Oil Profits Pollute the Air
Printer-Friendly Version
[As POSTed on the Internet EV List BB
Down Loaded from aol News Search. POSTed for public EV
informational purposes. Contact publication for reprint rights.]
SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 12, 1995--The oil industry is
soaking up billions of dollars in tax breaks, government funding, and
indirect subsidies that pay for oil related environmental damage.
Even as they reap these benefits, they are spending millions on
slick lobbying campaigns and political contributions to put the brakes
on California's growing electric and clean vehicle industry.
These are the conclusions of two reports released today by the Union
of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and the California Public Interest
Research Group (CalPIRG).
The UCS study, "Money Down the Pipeline: Uncovering the Hidden
Subsidies to the Oil Industry" concludes that the oil industry profits
from preferential treatment in tax laws and government support. While
the non-oil industries are taxed at a rate of 18 percent, the oil
industry is taxed at a mere 11 percent. This reduced rate equates to
$2 billion in federal corporate income tax benefits per year. They
also benefit from low state and local sales tax rates on gasoline, an
indirect subsidy exceeding $4 billion a year. Direct government
funding of oil and motor vehicle infrastructure and services tops off
at $45 billion a year. And taxpayers, not the oil industry, are left to
pay the cleanup bill for oil-related health and environmental damage,
which could be as high at $232 billion annually.
"The current system creates an energy policy by default through
lower income tax rates for oil companies, government handouts, and
hidden environmental costs," said Roland Hwang, author of the UCS
report. "These subsidies fuel our unhealthy appetite for oil."
CalPIRG's study reviewed Secretary of State records for industry
contributions to state elected officials, lobbying the governor, and
key statewide initiatives. From 1991 to 1995, oil companies spent
$27.5 million and the auto industry spent $5.4 million in lobbying
and campaign donations.
The study shows that Pete Wilson received almost a million dollars
from these two industries in the same time period. Wilson holds the
key to the future of zero-emission vehicles and has steadfastly
supported the ZEV program. However, his need for donations to his
presidential campaign could throw a monkey wrench into the emerging
clean vehicle industry in California.
"The oil industry is spending millions each year fighting clean air
laws, especially the electric vehicle requirement," said Ed Maschke,
executive director of CalPIRG. "This spending not only eats away at
the potential for cleaner air, increased employment and a promising
new technology, but also the very heart of our democracy. We are
committed to stopping this corporate attempt at buying influence
which destroys our chance for clean air."
CalPIRG will launch a campaign finance reform initiative next month
to stop such abuses. The initiative will be on the November 1996
ballot.
The Sierra Club noted that the oil industry received as much as $400
million to supply reformulated gasoline in California, courtesy of a
special state tax credit instituted by Gov. Wilson. This is in
addition to millions of dollars in California tax subsidies the oil
industry collects for modernizing and expanding their refineries.
"The oil industry has had a free ride for too long, secretly ringing
up a huge bill that the taxpayers have to pay. The oil industry may be
the most subsidized industry on earth - it's certainly the most
polluting," declared V. John White of Sierra Club California.
The groups, speaking on a knoll overlooking the Mobil Oil refinery
in Torrance, assailed a Mobil Oil vice president's recent attack on
"subsidies" for electric vehicles. VP Bob McCool's press statement
failed to even acknowledge the existence of subsidies to the oil
industry.
"It's time for the oil industry to `come clean' and abandon their
multi-million dollar campaign against electric and alternative fuel
vehicles," added Michelle Robinson of UCS. "Governor Wilson should
base his support for California's electric vehicle requirements on
its merits not the size of special interest wallets."
CONTACT:
UCS: Roland Hwang, Michelle Robinson, 510-843-1872
Joe Caves, 916-558-1516 Maureen Anderson, 916-546-6656
CalPIRG: Ed Maschke, 805-966-3122
Sierra Club: John White, 916-447-7983
...
BUSINESS WIRE, Tel# 415-986-4422, Fax# 415 788 5335, 44 Montgomery St,
Floor 39, SF, CA 94104 BW URL: http://www.hnt.com/bizwire
Please send questions and comments to
David Coale .
dcoale@wdl.lmco.com ___o\____
(408) 473-6481 (w) =)----/()_____()\
(415) 493-4503 (h)
|